읽기 3분 + 듣기 2분 + 작성 20분 통합형 라이팅의 5단락 템플릿과 점수대별 예시 답안을 한 화면에 모았습니다.
⏰ 시간 배분 (총 20분)
단계
시간
핵심 행동
읽기 노트
3분 (시험 시작 전)
주제·논지·근거 3개 키워드만
듣기 노트
2분 (강의 듣는 중)
반박/지지 + 근거 3개 키워드
구성 정리
1~2분
대응표 작성: 읽기 vs 듣기
작성
15~17분
5단락, 150~225 words 권장
검토
1~2분
철자·동사/시제·일치
20:00
📝 5단락 템플릿
① Introduction (서론, 2~3문장)
The reading and the lecture both discuss [주제].
The author of the reading argues that [읽기 주장].
However, the lecturer disputes this view (또는: supports this view) by presenting [지지/반박 요지].
② Body 1 (읽기 근거1 vs 강의 반박/지지1)
First, the reading states that [읽기 근거1].
On the contrary (또는: In support), the lecturer points out that [강의 반박/지지1].
Specifically, [강의 구체 예시].
③ Body 2 (읽기 근거2 vs 강의 반박/지지2)
Second, the reading claims that [읽기 근거2].
The lecturer counters (또는: confirms) this point by explaining that [강의 반박/지지2].
For example, [강의 구체 예시].
④ Body 3 (읽기 근거3 vs 강의 반박/지지3)
Finally, the reading suggests that [읽기 근거3].
Nevertheless (또는: In addition), the lecturer challenges (또는: reinforces) this idea by noting that [강의 반박/지지3].
In particular, [강의 구체 예시].
⑤ Conclusion (선택, 1문장)
In conclusion, the lecturer effectively refutes (또는: supports) all three points made by the author.
🎯 점수대별 예시 답안
20점대 예시 (기본 템플릿 활용, 약 160 words)
The reading and lecture both discuss the colonization of Mars. The author of the reading argues that humans should colonize Mars soon. However, the lecturer disputes this view by presenting three counterarguments.
First, the reading states that Mars has water. On the contrary, the lecturer points out that the water is frozen and difficult to extract. Specifically, current technology cannot melt the ice on a large scale.
Second, the reading claims that Mars has a thin atmosphere. The lecturer counters this point by explaining that the atmosphere is too thin to breathe. For example, humans would need pressurized suits at all times.
Finally, the reading suggests that Mars has resources. Nevertheless, the lecturer challenges this idea by noting that transporting resources back to Earth is too expensive.
25점대 예시 (연결어·구체화 강화, 약 200 words)
The reading passage and the lecture both examine the feasibility of colonizing Mars. While the author of the reading enthusiastically argues that humans should establish a colony on Mars in the near future, the lecturer systematically casts doubt on this view by raising three critical concerns.
To begin with, although the reading emphasizes that Mars possesses substantial water reserves, the lecturer counters that this water exists primarily as frozen ice trapped in the polar regions. She further notes that, with current technology, extracting and processing such ice on a meaningful scale is prohibitively difficult.
Moreover, the reading insists that Mars has an atmosphere capable of supporting human activity. However, the lecturer rebuts this claim by emphasizing that the atmospheric pressure on Mars is less than 1% of Earth's, meaning that humans would require pressurized suits and habitats at all times.
Finally, while the reading touts the abundance of Martian resources, the lecturer points out that the cost of transporting these resources back to Earth would vastly exceed their commercial value, rendering the venture economically unviable.
28+점 예시 (정교한 패러프레이즈·고급 어휘, 약 225 words)
Although the reading passage and the lecture address the same topic — the prospect of human colonization on Mars — they reach strikingly divergent conclusions. The author of the reading enthusiastically advocates for an imminent colonization mission, citing what he portrays as compelling advantages. The lecturer, by contrast, systematically dismantles each of these claims, contending that they overlook critical practical barriers.
First, while the reading emphasizes Mars's purportedly abundant water reserves, the lecturer counters that virtually all of this water is locked beneath the surface as ice, rendering large-scale extraction technologically and economically prohibitive given current capabilities.
Second, the reading touts the Martian atmosphere as a foundation for sustainable life support. The lecturer, however, refutes this assertion by pointing out that atmospheric pressure on Mars is less than one percent of Earth's, requiring colonists to remain inside pressurized environments indefinitely — a constraint that severely undermines long-term habitability.
Third, the reading celebrates Mars's mineral wealth as a commercial opportunity. The lecturer dismisses this prospect, observing that the staggering cost of interplanetary transport would dwarf any conceivable market value, leaving such enterprises economically irrational.
In sum, the lecturer's three rebuttals effectively neutralize the optimistic case presented in the reading, exposing the proposed colonization as far more problematic than the author acknowledges.
📒 내 노트
광고 영역 (하단)
토플 라이팅 통합형 완벽 가이드
토플(TOEFL iBT) 라이팅 통합형(Integrated Writing Task)은 3분 동안 학술적 지문을 읽고, 약 2분 분량의 강의를 들은 뒤, 20분 안에 양자의 관계(주로 강의가 읽기를 반박)를 정리하는 문항입니다. 150~225 words가 권장 분량이며, ETS는 정확한 정보 전달·논리적 구성·문법·어휘 사용을 기준으로 0~5점(공식 점수는 30점 환산)을 채점합니다. 본 도구는 5단락 표준 템플릿, 20분 시험 시간 분배표, 카운트다운 타이머, 점수대(20·25·28+)별 모범 답안, 자동 저장되는 노트 영역을 한 화면에 통합 제공합니다.
통합형 라이팅의 핵심은 「강의 정보 80% + 읽기 정보 20%」 비율로 요약하는 것입니다. 채점자는 강의 내용을 정확히 캡처했는지, 읽기와의 관계(반박/지지)를 명확히 표시했는지를 가장 중요하게 평가합니다. 본인의 의견·평가·주관적 판단은 절대 포함해서는 안 되며, 모든 정보는 두 텍스트에서만 가져와야 합니다. 패러프레이즈가 핵심이며, 읽기 원문을 그대로 복사하면 감점됩니다.
점수대별 차별점
① 20점대: 템플릿 기본 활용, 단순 동의어. ② 25점대: 연결어(although/whereas/moreover)와 강의 구체 예시 보강. ③ 28+점: 고급 어휘(prohibitively·unequivocally·systematically dismantles)·복합 구조·정교한 패러프레이즈.
자주 묻는 질문 (FAQ)
Q. 통합형은 강의 내용만 써도 되나요?
A. 안 됩니다. 강의가 어떤 읽기 포인트에 대응하는지 매번 명시해야 합니다(The reading states X, but the lecturer counters Y).
Q. 본인 의견을 추가해도 되나요?
A. 절대 안 됩니다. 통합형은 객관 요약 과제이며 본인 의견은 감점 사유입니다(독립형 Writing에서만 의견 허용).
Q. 분량은 얼마가 좋나요?
A. 150~225 words가 가장 안정적입니다. 250 words를 넘으면 시간 부족으로 오류가 늘고, 130 words 이하면 정보 부족으로 감점됩니다.